McKibben on Local Economies
This post continues the discussion of Bill McKibben's Deep Economy, begun here, continued here, and last touched upon here. In an attempt to round toward the finish line, we first discussed the relationship between wealth and satisfaction, then moved on to the question of farming and food. The last post focused on the shortcomings of the economy in principle and how we might see through them to a better future possibility.
This post, continuing many of the same themes, is focused on community. McKibben spends a great deal of time in the book slowly building a case that local is more powerful than global, that despite the reality that a global approach brings more "stuff" to the table, that stuff is wrought with problems and is in the long run environmentally untenable. He suggests that this global race has been pursued primarily as a way to grow economic systems that provide more income but less satisfaction, that the result of this pursuit is a food system wherein the objective is calories and not food, and that by disconnecting with the local we have left behind the reasonable social checks-and-balances that ensure our actions do no harm to our neighbors. What's the alternative? We need to start making connections with our neighbors, and fast.
Once it gets rolling, the building of connections can accelerate quickly. We learn once again what skills and gifts our neighbors possess, and they become valuable to us again, literally valuable, people we can start to depend on for some of our food, our capital, our entertainment. In a sense, this process is already under way on the Web. Internet scale is neither big nor small; it's distributed, as energy and food supplies may someday be. The small nodes hook together into something much larger, but not so monolithic it can't easily hive off into new sites and communities and forums. Despite every effort to turn it into one more television set controlled by the largest info-conglomerates, the Internet continues to operate more like -- to use my favorite metaphor -- a farmers' market, where a million people bring their products to sell. Or, really, to give away.
This Internet model, McKibben contends, works for a variety of reasons. First, since each small community has responsibility for the well-being of its members, it is likely to spend more time tending to the health and well-being of the group than in hyper-individualistic pursuits such as wealth-building. Next, since it is not reliant on any global grid (whether food system or energy or healthcare) it is able to provide for itself, and its individual failures do not put all of society at risk. It can change and adapt much more quickly. Also, it is intrinsically fair, since all actions are to the benefit or at the expense of neighbors.
In a sense, all discussion of local economies is about Fair Trade -- about raising wheat and lettuce in a way that honors both farmer and soil; about growing timber in a way that allows loggers to work at a reasonable pace and in a living forest; about saving and producing energy in quantities that don't require military adventure or climatic upheaval. About giving up some measure of efficiency for other values. Some of this trade must take place at a distance; as much as possible should take place closer to home, where it saves more energy and builds tighter bonds. As this effort spreads, our politics will eventually start to change as well. In a world where more people paid attention to the lives of farmers here and abroad -- met them at the market or on the Net -- it would be hard to maintain the current system of corporate subsidies and ruinous "free trade" agreements. If fairness demands a slightly higher price, and if that means we need to get along with somewhat smaller quantities, I am confident we will eventually find the tradeoff worth making.
Eventually, McKibben suggests, we must tread more lightly. And that means not just a smaller carbon footprint but also that we need to lower our voices a bit and listen more carefully to what is going on just around the corner, up the block. When we are aware of our communities and aware of what each participant brings to the collective table we are more responsive to the needs of the whole, versus each individualistic desire. This brings with it a level of fairness, sustainability and connectedness that we have lost in an era of speed and greed.
Slow down, he suggests. And pay attention.
Speaking of slowing down, here's a quick event announcement. Friday night at 7pm come enjoy food, film, commentary and art at Memphis' Brook Museum. From the Brooks site:
Join food celebrity John T. Edge and filmmaker Joe York for an exclusive screening of the film Above the Line: Saving Willie Mae's Scotch House.
Above the Line tells the story of the destruction and subsequent rebuilding of Willie Mae Seaton's famed Scotch House restaurant during Hurricane Katrina.
John is a member of Slow Food Memphis and will have an interesting take on this New Orleans tradition and the regional flavor it represents. Doors open at 6:30 and admission is $20 for non-members, $10 if you are a member of the museum. See you there!




Recent Comments